New Journal: Mathematical Programming Computation

I have recently joined the editorial board of the new journal Mathematical Programming Computation, which publishes original research articles that are at the intersection of math programming and computing. This journal reflects the growing role of computation in operations research, where real-world applications often require the application of complex software packages to analyze mathematical models.

This journal will include articles that report on innovative software, comparative tests, modeling environments, libraries of data, and/or applications. A main feature of the journal is the inclusion of accompanying software and data with submitted manuscripts. The journal's review process includes the evaluation and testing of the accompanying software. Where possible, the review will aim for verification of reported computational results.

Topics covered in Mathematical Programming Computation include linear programming, convex optimization, nonlinear optimization, stochastic optimization, robust optimization, integer programming, combinatorial optimization, global optimization, network algorithms, and modeling languages.

Comments

  1. UnknownOctober 7, 2008 at 10:03 AM

    This sounds like a very good idea, both to ensure that scientific results can be reproduced as well as giving peer-recognized incentive for scientists to publish their software.

    Just out of curiosity: will it be mandatory to publish the source under an accepted open-source license?

    The reason I am asking is that there are some projects like COIN-OR which use a very liberal open-source license which would allow derivative works; and there are others like SCIP which are not free but you can still look at the source.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bill HartOctober 8, 2008 at 6:46 AM

    Publishing source code should be independent of an article publication, even if it is open source. Furthermore, I expect that MPC will reference publicly available sites for open-source projects, if only to provide a resource for readers to learn about newer versions of the software that is used in an article.

    The goal of including math programming software is to encourage and support the scientific reproducibility of computational results. This is a broad goal that is applicable to both open-source and commercial software. For example, an article evaluating the capabilities of a specific version of a commercial tool meets the spirit of MPC.

    The MPC Aims and Scope statement says that "Submitted software is archived with the corresponding research articles. ... In case the software is no longer available through other means, MPC will distribute it on individual request under the license given by the author." This type of software redistribution management will clearly be more challenging for software without an open-source license. I'm sure that this policy will evolve to address this challenge.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Python Plugin Frameworks

Updated to include pointers to the PyUtilib Component Architecture and PnP. Various Python projects I am working on could benefit from the use of a Plug-in framework.  However, there does not appear to be a standard Python plug-in framework, though there are some mature packages that support plug-ins. Here's a summary of my recent web research: yapsy - This is a simple plug-in framework that was designed specifically to support plug-ins with no external dependencies. Mary Alchin describes a simple plugin framework , with a similar goal.  His classes provide an API for the plugins, with few supporting features (e.g. searching for plugins). André Roberge has a series of posts that describe the application of plugins to refactor a simple calculator application.  The goal of this is to illustrate the requirements for plugin frameworks, with the goal of identifying best practices for plugins. There are some interesting replies to this post, which consider implementations of the
Read more

Using AsciiDoc for Mathematical Publications

Technical writing is an integral part of my research in computer science and operations research. I have a long history using LaTeX, which is very well suited for writing technical articles that contain mathematical equations as well as code snippets. Although LaTeX can readily generate postscript and PDF output files, I have been unimpressed with tools that generate HTML from LaTeX source. Thus, I was intrigued by AsciiDoc , which promises to generate PDF, HTML and eBook formats. AsciiDoc is used to provide online documentation for software projects, and authors can publish book through O'Rielly using this tool. Thus, this is a well-developed document generation tool. I have successfully prototyped a draft book, Getting Started with Coopr , and you can browse the subversion repository for this document here . Note that the Makefile file specifies build targets for PDF, HTML and eBook files. The advantage of AsciiDoc is that you can use a simple markup language to generate
Read more

A Different Model for Writing Blog Posts

This is a blog that I have been meaning to write for some time.   I occasionally take a look at the download statistics for this blog, and recently I was prompted to do this by other bloggers who were reporting their end-of-year statistics (e.g. see Laura McLay’s review of the Punk Rock OR blog ). Unlike Laura, I do not have impressive download statistics to report about the many blogs I have written in 2011; frankly, I did not create many posts. However, an interesting pattern has emerged regarding this blog’s readership:   there are a few key blog posts that are frequently downloaded.   For example, my most frequently downloaded blog post is a survey of Python plugin software, which I wrote in 2009.   I suspect that other bloggers have seen the same thing; they have a few posts that are very popular because people do web searches on that topic.   However, it is worth stepping back and thinking about the implications of this when writing a blog. When I first started b
Read more